ONE-THIRD OF THE CONTENTS OF OUR BOOKS ARE BEING BLOGGED IN THIS SITE


OPPRESSORS ARE ILLOGICAL THINKERS

Bashers are confused and uninformed critiques

Pagtutulungan po nating iangat ang ating panig. Madalas kasi, ang dahilan kung bakit tayo minamasama ay nasa tamang panig tayo ngunit hindi natin alam kung paano ititindig ang ating katwiran. Hindi natin alam kung paano tayo maghahanay ng argumento. So, equip yourself with simple logical prowess to free yourself from or counter against an oppressor or a bully who deprives you of reputation because of his misplaced arguments.

 

 

THIS IS A PLATFORM THAT ADVOCATES AND ENCOURAGES THE USE OF LOGIC IN DAY TO DAY DEALINGS. IT CATERS PRIMARILY TO THOSE WHO ARE OPPRESSED, MISJUDGED, AND MISINTERPRETED; AND KNOW WHAT IS RIGHT BUT CANNOT STAND THEIR GROUND OR CANNOT REASON OUT BECAUSE OF THEIR MEDIOCRITY. IT CATERS ALSO TO THOSE WHO FIND THEMSELVES IN DILEMMA AS TO HOW TO DECIDE CONFRONTATIONAL AND ADVERSARY ISSUES.

 

 

Oppressors Are Illogical Thinkers

While many people may have excelled in their chosen career, vocation, and trade, yet more often than not, in the middle  or at the height of their success, comfort, merit, and distinction, they end up losing their glory. Most of the time, the culprit is the antagonism that they harshly meet from their bashers, haters, enviers, doubters, and even racist detractors.
 
 
 

Antagonism is one of the most disagreeable things that we hate, but we cannot avoid living by. No matter how far we may have excelled, may it be excellence in achievement or excellence in humble good deed, sometimes we find ourselves being pulled harshly down due to that humble excellence of ours. The opposition does really exist anytime anywhere.

 

Now, let us be straightforward that excellence in our lifestyle or career may not carry with it an excellence in the way that we put up against antagonisms. Most often, it is our mediocrity (kahinaan, pagiging baguhan) in the way that we defend ourselves, we lay down our reasons, and we counter the attack of the oppositors that would send us defeated. Let us then help out each other overcome such mediocrity.


This forum is an advocacy whose objective is to motivate and  to encourage the use of logic in our day to day dealings. Readers and learners may relate to the topics discussed herein and then adapt the wisdom being hinted. They may also adapt the wisdom that is to be treated from time to time in the herein blogs concerning logical argumentation correlated to legal instructions by the bloggers/team members of this site-forum with backgrounds in book writing, law, and philosophy. We cannot aim perfection but at least with this forum of knowledge sharing and interaction with the writers and the readers, we can set many things straight. We believe that it is logic that could target problem areas. Our defense against oppressors is logic because it is the same thing that they distort to strike at us.

Let’s start saying it logically

SEND IN YOUR ISSUES AND CONCERNS. OR SHARE OR CONTRIBUTE ISSUES FROM YOUR ACTUAL ENCOUNTERS OR OBSERVATIONS TO WHICH THE READERS MAY RELATE. SEE THE DISCLAIMER PAGE FOR THE INSTRUCTIONS. PLEASE TAKE NOTE: WE WILL TACKLE OR TREAT ACTUAL OR REAL-LIFE ISSUES BUT WE WILL NOT NAME NAMES. AGAIN, SEE THE DISCLAIMER PAGE FOR THE INSTRUCTIONS. WE MAY USE FILIPINO LANGUAGE HERE. SO, FILIPINO READERS MAY OPT TO SEND THEIR CONCERNS IN FILIPINO LANGUAGE.

http://say-it-right.com/blog/oppressors-are-illogical-thinkers/

 

 

Problema dahil sa mediocrity ( pagkahindi-sanay) sa pangangatwiran

Nais namin na makagabay sa inyo sa paghanay ng inyong katwiran kung sa pagtasa ninyo at namin ay nasa tamang panig kayo ngunit hindi ninyo magawang itindig na mainam ang inyong argumento laban sa nanghihimasok, nang-aapi, at nanghuhusga. Kadalasan, ang dahilan ng ating pagbagsak, pagkasira ng reputasyon, kumplikasyon, at pagkasira ng pagsasama sa mga nakapaligid sa atin halimbawa’y katrabaho, kapamilya, kapitbahay at iba pa ay ang hindi natin kasanayan (mediocrity) sa tamang pangangatwiran. Lohika (logic) po lamang ang pinakamataas na uri ng kasangkapan, pangalawa sa spiritual intercession, para suyurin ang problema, ayusin ang gulo at kumplikasyon,o kaya’y ipagtanggol ang sarili.  Nalulungkot kami sapagkat sa madalas na pagkakataon, ito (ang lohika) ang kinakaligtaan ng maraming tao upang iangkop ang kanilang isipan, gawa, at pagdidesisyon sa mga mahahalagang aspeto ng kanilang buhay. Ito po ang nais naming ipang-impluwensiya. Harinawa, kami ay makahikayat na ito ay pairalin, gawing pamantayan at isabuhay!


The following is a sample of a misjudgment, misinterpretation, or misplaced argument timely corrected by a logical rebuttal

 
Detect Argument3

 

 

WHAT’S THE PROBLEM OR ISSUE? WELL, FIGURE OF SPEECH IS MISUNDERSTOOD

 

The picture is a cover design of a college paper of a university several years ago. A basher of the editor-in-chief assailed the latter because the caption of the picture goes, thus, “Paglaki ko ‘tay, magiging sabungero din ako, gaya mo. Kasi aydol kita e. Itong tirador sa leeg ko, oke lang ‘to. Paglaki ko, magiging titrador din ako. Kasi aydol kita. Ang galing natin ‘tay ano?” (When I grow up, Dad, I will be a cockfight goer, just like you. Because you’re my idol. This slingshot in my neck, it will be just fine. When I grow up, I’ll be a hitman like you. Coz you’re my idol. We’re superb, Dad, aren’t we?)

 

The basher outburst, “Why such a sinister child for the cover page? Why such a cover page that is psychologically menacing for the readers? It is not a good influence. Why not a child with a book and a pen depicting a scene of one being studious?

 

 

 

 

 


SAY IT RIGHT LOGICALLY
brings the above issue to light—

 

 

Who is wrong?

It is not the editor who is wrong with the way he renders his caption for the picture. It is the basher who is wrong with his misunderstood grasping of the editor’s style of the rendition of the caption.

The basher seemed to have forgotten college lesson about Figure of Speech

Does the basher not get the point? Yes. The basher loses sight that the editor uses Irony, one of the FIGURES OF SPEECH in English along with Simile, Metaphor, Personification, Hyperbole, etc. Irony means the opposite of what is intended by the conveyor, user, writer, or speaker. Irony is one of the best forms of satire the purpose of the user of which is to catch attention, to correct one’s thinking, and to prod one’s thought purposely to make effective conveyance of the user’s view.

 

What is the editor’s style?

So, obviously, the editor simply wanted to catch the attention of his readers and to prod the guilt of those who will be hit by the meaning of the caption in an effective manner of conveying his thought, being the opposite of his intention, thus, Irony. It was rendered in a satirical form. He used satire in the form of Irony. He is just prodding the conscience of any parent or would-be parent who would get the chance of reading the caption for the picture. So that, by Irony, he could convey the meaning that that is what is going to any child if they as parents will set up wrong patterns to emulate.

So, the editor’s style is a common writers’ style

The editor’s style is simply Irony. It is an effective satirical style of writing. It’s just Figure of Speech!

 

PLEASE SELECT THE CATEGORY STAND GROUND WHEN YOU ARE RIGHT (WITH LOGIC) FOR THE RELEVANT BLOGS